Welcome to Patents and Trademarks Guide
Ridiculous Patents Article
. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.
Legal Issues About Trademarks And Domain Names
from: Peter Goldberg
Trade marks are a name or symbol that are used to distinguish the goods of services of a particular company from others.
Similar to copyrights and other signs of intellectual property, the effects of the trademark system is territorial. This means, that each country has its own trademark system. A brand name like Machine Head may be owned by one person in the United Kingdom and by another, totally unrelated, person in the United States.
The domain name system, which is putting most of its emphasis on the .com title as the international domain, does not really jive well with the trade mark system because of the latter’s fundamental definition of “ownership.”
A case in point is the Prince vs Prince suit. Prince, the US-based manufacturers of sports goods, challenged the use of the www.prince.com domain name by a British computer consultancy company. The said company registered the domain in good faith and have been using it. The Prince sports goods company, which has no registered UK trademark, threatened to sue the British company for US trademark infringement. The latter counter-sued in the UK for the unwarranted threats regarding trademark infringement. They eventually won and the US company had to contend with just using the domain name www.princetennis.com.
Alternatively, a different scenario where the trademark owner will most likely prevail over a domain name holder’s rights is in the case of Marks & Spencer vs One in a Million. This particular case was elevated to the English High Court in 1997 when various trademark holders, including the world-famous UK retailer Marks & Spencer, sued One In A Million, a company who accumulated a number of domain names under the well-known trademarks like Sainsburys, Virgin, Marks & Spencer, and Cellnet. These domain names, and others, were bought with the express goal of selling them again to the trademark owners. The High Court decided that One In A Million be required to relinquish their claim on the said domain names. This decision was further upheld by the Court of Appeal.
The One In A Million company’s basis of argument was that domain name registrations were first come, first served”, thus, the trademark owners do not have any rights to the domain names.
Based on the two actual court cases we can build up a clear picture about the interrelation of trademarks and domain names.
In general, domains that have no trademark significance can be acquired by the entity who registered them first. Continuous use of this non-trademarked name will allow the holder to build a reputation on the name. When the situation is between to legitimate companies who have a right to the name then, as with the stipulation of most laws in most countries, the first person who registers will get the domain. However, a registrant to a domain that is also a subject of a trademark and who does not have any entitlements is going to be forbidden based on the laws of most countries. For more information please visit http://www.dolphinformations.co.uk.
About The Author
Peter Goldberg runs the website http://www.dolphinformations.co.uk which is your expert resource for all business related issues.
Ridiculous Patents News
Chief executive showdown in San Francisco - Today's iPhone
 Today's iPhone | Chief executive showdown in San Francisco Today's iPhone ... of Apple and Korean giant Samsung come together for mediation, overseen by the court in San Francisco, in a bid to try and come to some kind of agreement over the massive, never-ending and frankly ridiculous patent war between the two companies. Apple tries to ban Galaxy Tab in US days before peace talks |
Another Ridiculous Number From The Patent Wars - NPR (blog)
Another Ridiculous Number From The Patent Wars NPR (blog) And companies are spending billions of dollars buying up patent portfolios. Here's another interesting data point we just came across: Roughly 40000 software patents are issued every year. The ridiculous number of new patents means that, ... |
Judge Takes Oracle Attorney to Task Over Importance of 9 Lines of Code - TechNewsWorld
 Ars Technica | Judge Takes Oracle Attorney to Task Over Importance of 9 Lines of Code TechNewsWorld By Peter Suciu The notion that Google swiped nine lines of Java code in order to speed Android to market apparently struck Judge William Alsup, who is presiding over the headline-grabbing trial, as ridiculous. Comments he made to David Boies likely ... Oracle tells jury "clean room" not enough to avoid patent infringement |
Ridiculous IT News: Fresh from Valley View - InformationWeek
Ridiculous IT News: Fresh from Valley View InformationWeek Like Microsoft buying AOL patents (one can imagine what they'll do with AOL's hold on the ability to stuff magazines with CDs), or AT&T changing its slogan (to "it's what you do with what we do" which is, frankly, pretty silly) or T-Mobile spokeswoman ... |
Nvidia Files Patent For Hierarchical Graphics Processors - Tom's Hardware Guide
Nvidia Files Patent For Hierarchical Graphics Processors Tom's Hardware Guide Filed earlier this year as an extension of the existing patent 7634637, Nvidia has applied for a patent that describes a hierarchical processor array. The idea is that there are two or three tiers of processing cores with dedicated functions that ... |
HTC One X, Evo 4G LTE Delayed in Customs Due to Apple Patent Infringement - RootzWiki
 RootzWiki | HTC One X, Evo 4G LTE Delayed in Customs Due to Apple Patent Infringement RootzWiki It also raises, yet again, the question of how ridiculous are smart phone patents that something this minor could cause such a major disruption for customers? Naturally, Apple fan sites are ecstatic about this news, as they see it as another victory of ... |
Yahoo Claims Patents For Open Source Technologies - WebProNews
Yahoo Claims Patents For Open Source Technologies WebProNews Here's hoping the judge understands how ridiculous Yahoo's latest patent claims are. Facebook is not the only one at risk anymore. Yahoo has become an enemy of the Web development community, a community they claim to cater, by attacking these latest ... |